Skip to content

Conversation

dchenk
Copy link
Contributor

@dchenk dchenk commented Dec 7, 2024

I encountered a TypeError when my patchRoutesOnNavigation function threw an error but there were no partial matches. I tracked the error down to this code in packages/react-router/lib/router/router.ts:

        let boundaryId = findNearestBoundary(discoverResult.partialMatches)
          .route.id;

The problem is that findNearestBoundary can return undefined, but it's typed as returning AgnosticDataRouteMatch. I was able to reproduce the bug in a test (the first commit on this branch).

Notice the Cannot read properties of undefined error in the failing tests.

The reason this matters is that the error boundary does not get triggered in this case.

Notice the "Cannot read properties of undefined"
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 7, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9a224f4

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@brophdawg11
Copy link
Contributor

This TypeError should be handled by #14198 but it's worth noting that in this type of setup you have in the test there's no real error boundary to bubble to so you probably still won't satisfy the issue at hand:

The reason this matters is that the error boundary does not get triggered in this case.

If you want to handle these it's best to wrap everything in a root layout route path:'/' or path:'' with an error boundary so there is always at least one partial match for the error to bubble to. That would avoid the type error as well, but this fix should at least avoid the undefined object access and let the router continue along.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants