Skip to content

Conversation

amd-khushbu
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Added support for Preshuffle B(weight) tensor with block scale gemm.

Checklist

Please put an x into the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're not sure, please don't hesitate to ask.

  • I have added tests relevant to the introduced functionality, and the unit tests are passing locally
  • I have added the test to REGRESSION_TESTS list defined at the top of CMakeLists.txt in tests/CMakeLists.txt, IF the test takes more than 30 seconds to run.
  • I have added inline documentation which enables the maintainers with understanding the motivation
  • I have removed the stale documentation which is no longer relevant after this pull request
  • (If this change is user-facing) I have added release notes which provide the end users with a brief summary of the improvement from this pull request
  • I have run clang-format on all changed files
  • Any dependent changes have been merged

Discussion

If this is a relatively large or complex change, feel free to start a discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered

Copy link
Contributor

@ThomasNing ThomasNing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall. Added a few comments and please sync up with the develop branch to resolve the merge conflicts.

{
using BlockWarps = typename Problem::BlockGemmShape::BlockWarps;
using WarpTile = typename Problem::BlockGemmShape::WarpTile;
// static_assert(std::is_same_v<typename Problem::ComputeDataType, ck_tile::pk_int4_t>,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra comments.

};

template <typename Problem, typename PipelinePolicy = GemmWPQuantPipelineAgBgCrPolicy>
struct WPQuantBPipelineAgBgCrV1 : public BaseWPQuantBPipelineAgBgCrV1<Problem>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are now upgrading to V2 let's use the V2 pipeline.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants