Skip to content

NeuVector process with sensitive arguments lead to leakage

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 26, 2025 in neuvector/neuvector • Updated Aug 28, 2025

Package

gomod github.com/neuvector/neuvector (Go)

Affected versions

>= 5.0.0, < 5.4.6

Patched versions

5.4.6

Description

Impact

When a Java command with password parameters is executed and terminated by NeuVector for Process rule violation. For example,

java -cp /app ... Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=<Password>

The command with the password appears in the NeuVector security event. To prevent this, NeuVector uses the following default regular expression to detect and redact sensitive data from process commands:

(?i)(password|passwd|token)

Also, you can define custom patterns to redact by creating a Kubernetes ConfigMap. For example:

kubectl create configmap neuvector-custom-rules --from-file=secret-patterns.yaml -n neuvector

Sample secret-patterns.yaml content:

Pattern_list:
  - (?i)(pawd|pword)
  - (?i)(secret)

NeuVector uses the default and custom regex to decide whether the process command in a security event should be redacted.

Note: If numerous regular expression (regex) patterns are configured in the Kubernetes ConfigMap for extended coverage of sensitive data matching, it can significantly impact performance of NeuVector enforcer, particularly in scenarios involving large inputs or frequent execution. The primary factor contributing to performance issues in regex is backtracking, where the regex engine attempts various matching paths when a pattern doesn't immediately find a match.

Patches

This issue is fixed in NeuVector version 5.4.6 and later.

Workarounds

There is no workaround. Upgrade to a patched version of NeuVector as soon as possible.

References

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

References

@BinX-Suse BinX-Suse published to neuvector/neuvector Aug 26, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 28, 2025
Reviewed Aug 28, 2025
Last updated Aug 28, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Learn more on MITRE.

Missing Password Field Masking

The product does not mask passwords during entry, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture passwords. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2025-54467

GHSA ID

GHSA-w54x-xfxg-4gxq

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.