Adds micro-benchmark queries for existence joins #17552
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It seems they're all using Hash Join and the selectivity doesn't count the equi-join predicates |
|
@SubhamSinghal Joins will only use a nested loop join strategy if there is only filters (ex. |
|
The queries aren’t runnable right now. Are they AI-generated? If so, I might not be able to help review them. I strongly recommend working on an issue that you can fully understand, and thank you for the attempt. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
address this issue: #16820
Describe the solution you'd like
Add queries for existence join in the benchmark.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response