Initial CNCF TAG Workloads Foundation charter #1774
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
riaankleinhans
changed the title
pacoxu
changed the title
|
cc @cncf/tag-workloads-foundation-leads |
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
I just realize that this team does not include tech leads. Hope to complete this by the end of the week or early next week. |
|
Thanks for the reminder, just sent the request~ |
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuan Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
terrytangyuan
changed the title
|
The current scope are too brief. Should we add some explanations and examples(repo or feature name) for each scope? |
Yeah, that'd be great! Having a brief explanation as well as some example projects would help people understand the scope correctly. |
Some items are too obvious to add more explanations, but some example projects are helpful. Added some. |
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
| - Containers (e.g. Podman, buildpacks, etc.) | ||
| - OS | ||
| - Container Runtime(e.g. containerd, CRI-O, Kata, etc.) | ||
| - Virtual Machines (e.g. KubeVirt, Firecracker, etc.) | ||
| - Serverless (e.g. Knative, etc.) | ||
| - Web Assembly (e.g. WasmEdge, etc.) | ||
| - Batch (e.g. Kueue, JobSet, KJob, etc. ) | ||
| - Serving (e.g. KServe, Gateway API Inference Extension etc.) | ||
| - Scheduling (e.g. Volcano, HAMi, etc.) | ||
| - Orchestrator (e.g. Kubernetes, Karmada, Argo Workflows, etc.) | ||
| - Deployment (e.g. Helm, kustomize, etc.) | ||
| - Dynamic Scaling (e.g. KEDA, Karpenter, Cluster Autoscaler, etc.) | ||
| - CI/CD (e.g. Argo CD, Flux, etc.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quick question, is it expected that a new cncf project trying to update any line of this part just to add a new example?
I guest not, so maybe remove the examples here, or replace with some non-project brand specific description.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, I don’t think examples are necessary, except in a few cases where the category is broad or the meaning overlaps with another. But specific description may be augable, due to the scope can be tighter or looser.
So I removed those examples. Anyway, the discussions in this PR may also help other understand the scope.
| This TAG covers the following sub-domains and topics within its scope: | ||
|
|
||
| - Containers (e.g. Podman, buildpacks, etc.) | ||
| - OS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some background of the OS: the operating system here is more focused on special purpose operating system, e.g. container OSs, that were designed to run well defined workloads with minimal boilerplate of dependencies suited for niche use cases.
Ref: #1154
Signed-off-by: Paco Xu <[email protected]>
Kindly Ping. Do you have time to take a look again? Then we can announce our community meeting soon. |
|
LGTM - thank you for incorporating the feedback! |
This is from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yy7XAtvKS2hqt0P52dvyilHnBFYPLwfod1xV12dZHic/edit?tab=t.0
/cc @cncf/tag-workloads-foundation-leads
/assign @kevin-wangzefeng @chira001 @riaankleinhans