Fix #27015. Document ServiceName

[eulores]

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eulores
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign l0rd for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[eulores]

According to source file podman/pkg/systemd/quadlet/quadlet.go, lines 1474..., both .container and .kube quadlets take their service name straight from the quadlet name, no suffix added.

[ninja-quokka]

Hey @eulores

It seems one of your commits doesn't have the sign off: 7fcd30d

You can either squash your commits or amend that single commit and force push.

This update is great, surprising about kube and container service file naming.

[ninja-quokka]

Also can you please add "Fixes: #27015" to your PR description

[ygalblum]

both .container and .kube quadlets take their service name straight from the quadlet name, no suffix added.

Yes, this is correct as they are considered the main services.

Can you think of a way of using a template for this key? Most of the description is repetitive

[baude]

I think the @@option usage may help with the repetition ? You also need to sign your commits; consider git commit -s --amend