Skip to content

Conversation

mpkorstanje
Copy link
Contributor

@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje commented Jul 17, 2025

⚡️ What's your motivation?

The json schema contained several spurious space, astrix and other bit of text. Removing these makes the documentation much easier to read.

There are other mistakes still present but they're not so easy to spot automatically.

🏷️ What kind of change is this?

  • 📖 Documentation (improvements without changing code)

📋 Checklist:

  • I agree to respect and uphold the Cucumber Community Code of Conduct
  • I've changed the behaviour of the code
    • I have added/updated tests to cover my changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • Users should know about my change
    • I have added an entry to the "Unreleased" section of the CHANGELOG, linking to this pull request.

The json schema contained several spurious space, astrix and other bit
of text. Removing these makes the documentation much easier to read.
@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje requested a review from luke-hill July 17, 2025 23:20
@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2025 23:20
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"$id": "Envelope.json",
"additionalProperties": false,
"description": "When removing a field, replace it with reserved, rather than deleting the line.\n When adding a field, add it to the end and increment the number by one.\n See https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto#updating for details\n\n*\n All the messages that are passed between different components/processes are Envelope\n messages.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this description meant to have gone?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. I don't think the protobuf instructions matter anymore.

Copy link
Contributor

@luke-hill luke-hill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor query, but some nice little tidy ups.

I need to revisit the codegen stuff to see if I can optimise anything but that's a job for another time

@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje merged commit 12c70f3 into main Jul 18, 2025
27 checks passed
@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje deleted the remove-spurious-asterix branch July 18, 2025 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants