Skip to content

Conversation

DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member

This removes the code that discovers and downloads OmniSharp from the GitHub and switches over to Azure blog storage.

cc @MattGertz, @gregg-miskelly, @caslan, @chuckries, @jaredpar

package.json Outdated
"runtime": "",
"runtimeArgs": [],
"program": "./out/coreclr-debug/proxy.js",
"program": "./coreclr-debug/debugAdapters/OpenDebugAD7",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You don't want this change

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell force-pushed the fix-omnisharp-download branch from 00282f5 to 4b48c62 Compare May 16, 2016 22:29
@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed those bits Gregg.


const repo = new Github({ repo: OmnisharpRepo, token: ApiToken });
const assetName = getOmnisharpAssetName();
const urlString = `${BaseDownloadUrl}/${assetName}`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if we really want to fix this since it is already published to blob storage, but should there be a version number as part of this URL?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Almost certainly, but I agree that we could do that next time.

@gregg-miskelly
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise LGTM

@jaredpar
Copy link
Member

Can't comment too intelligently on TypeScript, but the logic looks good.

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell merged commit 230ed90 into dotnet:master May 16, 2016
@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell deleted the fix-omnisharp-download branch June 8, 2016 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants