Skip to content

Conversation

Wcubed
Copy link
Contributor

@Wcubed Wcubed commented Jun 27, 2024

For a project I am currently attempting to use the acceskit output of egui to preform end-to-end integration tests of my application. However, the output is currently quite basic (buttons for example don't report that they are disabled).

Before adding new features to the acceskit integration, I thought it would be a good idea to add some testing to egui's accesskit output.
I have started with a simple test for button texts, to get feedback on whether this is the correct direction to go in.

Copy link
Owner

@emilk emilk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great; thank you! And I am too interested in using accesskit for this purpose, so I'll be following your work :)

@emilk emilk added accessibility More accessible to e.g. the visually impaired dev-experience egui labels Jun 27, 2024
@emilk emilk merged commit 779312a into emilk:master Jun 28, 2024
@Wcubed Wcubed deleted the accesskit_tests branch June 28, 2024 11:20
hacknus pushed a commit to hacknus/egui that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
For a project I am currently attempting to use the acceskit output of
egui to preform end-to-end integration tests of my application. However,
the output is currently quite basic (buttons for example don't report
that they are disabled).

Before adding new features to the acceskit integration, I thought it
would be a good idea to add some testing to egui's accesskit output.
I have started with a simple test for button texts, to get feedback on
whether this is the correct direction to go in.

---------

Co-authored-by: Wybe Westra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accessibility More accessible to e.g. the visually impaired dev-experience egui
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants