All Core Devs - Consensus (ACDC) #158, May 29 2025

[ralexstokes]

All Core Devs - Consensus (ACDC) #158, May 29, 2025

• May 29, 2025, 14:00 UTC

Agenda

• Fusaka
  • fusaka-devnet-0
  • Decide if/how to SFI EIP-7917
  • PeerDAS
    • BPO open issues
    • validator custody open issues
  • fusaka-devnet-1 scope/timing
• Glamsterdam
  • discuss "Fork focus"
  • Headliner preview
    • EIP-7732: ePBS
    • EIP-7805: FOCIL
  • discuss desired community input
• Research, open questions

Facilitator emails: stokes@ethereum.org

🤖 config

• Duration in minutes : 90
• Recurring meeting : true
• Call series : ACDC
• Occurrence rate : bi-weekly
• Already a Zoom meeting ID : true
• Already on Ethereum Calendar : true
• Need YouTube stream links : true
• display zoom link in invite : false # Set to true to add the Zoom link to the Google Calendar invite description

[github-actions]

Discourse Topic ID: 24208

• Action: Updated at 2025-05-27 23:46 UTC
• URL: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/24208

Zoom Meeting: Reusing meeting 85969202880 for series 'acdc'.

• Zoom link hidden (sent to facilitator email)

Existing YouTube Stream Links (Reused):

• Stream 1 (May 29, 2025): https://youtube.com/watch?v=cIHtUaIev4M

Calendar Event: Reusing existing event for series.

• Approximate Google Calendar Link
• Skipping email notification (already processed issue All Core Devs - Consensus (ACDC) #158, May 29 2025 #1548 before).

Telegram Notification

• Updated message for this occurrence to Ethereum Protocol Updates channel

[Mart1i1n]

I would like to give an introduction to the liveness attack we have found and a reorg resilient improvement for Ethereum PoS that we proposed in EIP-7942.

[ralexstokes]

hi @Mart1i1n ! are you looking to present the research or do you want to propose the EIP for potential inclusion in Glamsterdam? i would like to keep this call focused to discussion around Fusaka or Glamsterdam following community calls for expedition in the upgrade cycle. at the same time, it doesn't look like there has been much engagement from the core dev community or others yet on the ethresear.ch post -- what do you think about taking to the Eth R&D discord?

[abcoathup]

H-star name for Consensus Layer upgrade after Glamsterdam
Poll for signaling purposes only.

I know it's early as we are implementing Fusaka and about to start scoping Glamsterdam, but names are useful to think about what might the upgrade after Glamsterdam include.

[Mart1i1n]

hi @Mart1i1n ! are you looking to present the research or do you want to propose the EIP for potential inclusion in Glamsterdam? i would like to keep this call focused to discussion around Fusaka or Glamsterdam following community calls for expedition in the upgrade cycle. at the same time, it doesn't look like there has been much engagement from the core dev community or others yet on the ethresear.ch post -- what do you think about taking to the Eth R&D discord?

Hi, our presentation will focus on introducing our EIP, which could potentially be added to the Glamsterdam hardfork.

[ralexstokes]

@Mart1i1n we are following a new process for Glamsterdam EIPs so you'd need to propose your EIP as a headliner (or if not a headliner, we will table for later in the process)

Summary of the flow here: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7773-glamsterdam-network-upgrade-meta-thread/21195#p-51376-glamsterdam-scoping-timeline-1

[Mart1i1n]

Thanks @ralexstokes for the clarification!

I'd like to propose this EIP as a Headliner for Glamsterdam.

[Mart1i1n]

The headliner EIP of Available Attestation can be found here: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/glamsterdam-headliner-proposal-available-attestation/24377

[ralexstokes]

closing in lieu of #1579