Fix typo in moviegoer

[lemonade-37]

Typos in the Moviegoer documentation file have been corrected.
Please review.

Reference:

• Moviegoer
• Exercism Community Topics（Fix typo in Moviegoer HINTS.md）

[github-actions]

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.

---

Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

[kotp]

This is not a typographical error, it is as intended. The method called is an instance method, as we can see and verify from the tests:

def test_regular_ticket_price
  assert_equal 15, Moviegoer.new(59).ticket_price
end

[lemonade-37]

Since it was originally documented within exercises/concept/moviegoer/moviegoer.rb, I believe “Moviegoer#watch_scary_movie” is correct. What do you think?

  def watch_scary_movie?
    raise 'Please implement the Moviegoer#watch_scary_movie method'
  end

Additionally, instance methods of the same format are also written using “#” in the problem statement.
Therefore, I thought it would be better to standardize the notation for instance methods.

Write the Moviegoer#ticket_price method using a ternary statement.

[kotp]

I know for a fact that it is correct. Class#method_name is for instance methods and Class.method_name, as well as the less used Class::method_name is for class methods. The first example is not usable invocable code, but is how we have documented Ruby code since well before 1.8.5.

[kotp]

This change is good.

[kotp]

Sorry for the noise, we are saying the same thing, I am being round-about with it, and did not realize it.

[lemonade-37]

@kotp
I'm sorry I wasn't very good at English and didn't fully understand your intentions.
Thank you so much for handling the review this time!