Skip to content

Conversation

lkingland
Copy link
Member

@lkingland lkingland commented Feb 4, 2025

Changes

  • 🎁 Host builder now supports Python Functions

  • 🎁 Can now func run Python Functions locally outside of a container (no container runtime required)

  • 🎁 Python Functions now suppport instanced method signatures

  • 🎁 Python Functions now support lifecycle events (start, stop, readiness, liveness)

  • 🎁 Updates Python Template Tests to use pytest

  • 🎁 Python Functions now use the ASGI Spec and run using an ASGI optimized server

  • 🎁 adds support for base images to the OCI builder

  • 🧹 Cleans up .gitignore

  • 🧹 Cleans up and simplifies the OCI builder

  • 🧹 Cleans up and simplifies the repository management code

  • 🧹 removes broken interactive prompts from the run command pending forthcoming UX update

/kind enhancement

Fixes #

Release Note

Python Functions now use the ASGI specification for method signature.
Python Functions now support instances and lifecycle events.  See the new templates for details.
The Host builder now can build and run Python functions locally without a container.

Docs


Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added kind/enhancement do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Feb 4, 2025
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from jrangelramos and rhuss February 4, 2025 13:39
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2025
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 4, 2025
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 4, 2025
@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Feb 7, 2025

nice for getting this started

@lkingland lkingland force-pushed the scaffolding-python branch from ec91040 to 182c74c Compare March 4, 2025 07:00
@lkingland lkingland force-pushed the scaffolding-python branch from b813d8c to 269a8b2 Compare March 6, 2025 09:57
@knative knative deleted a comment from codecov bot Mar 24, 2025
@lkingland lkingland force-pushed the scaffolding-python branch 3 times, most recently from 7488267 to a51bd6a Compare March 25, 2025 13:38
@lkingland lkingland force-pushed the scaffolding-python branch from a51bd6a to 9ecb85c Compare March 25, 2025 13:53
@knative knative deleted a comment from knative-prow bot Mar 25, 2025
@knative knative deleted a comment from codecov bot Mar 26, 2025
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 27, 2025
@matzew
Copy link
Member

matzew commented Mar 27, 2025

ON, https://github.com/lkingland/func/tree/scaffolding-python/templates/python
can we have a README.md ? with a bit of overview?

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 1, 2025
@lkingland lkingland force-pushed the scaffolding-python branch from 3ae0f09 to 727d1dd Compare April 1, 2025 11:58
@knative knative deleted a comment from knative-prow bot Apr 1, 2025
@knative knative deleted a comment from codecov bot Apr 1, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.01238% with 465 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 62.48%. Comparing base (c7a95dd) to head (727d1dd).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/oci/builder.go 60.62% 195 Missing and 55 partials ⚠️
pkg/oci/python_builder.go 0.00% 133 Missing ⚠️
pkg/functions/runner.go 0.00% 57 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/functions/repository.go 84.37% 7 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pkg/mock/client.go 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
pkg/builders/s2i/assemblers.go 50.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
cmd/run.go 87.50% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/build.go 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/oci/go_builder.go 96.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.61%   62.48%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines       15588    15921     +333     
==========================================
+ Hits         9761     9949     +188     
- Misses       4902     5017     +115     
- Partials      925      955      +30     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test 34.94% <8.09%> (-0.93%) ⬇️
e2e-test-oncluster 33.36% <7.58%> (+0.48%) ⬆️
e2e-test-oncluster-runtime 27.86% <7.37%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go 25.91% <8.09%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node 25.33% <7.68%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 25.41% <7.68%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust 24.42% <7.37%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 24.46% <7.37%> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript 25.42% <7.68%> (?)
integration-tests 48.81% <50.46%> (+1.08%) ⬆️
unit-tests 48.79% <51.70%> (?)
unit-tests-macos-latest ?
unit-tests-ubuntu-latest ?
unit-tests-windows-latest ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@gauron99 gauron99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Once Functions is stable and post 1.0, it would be worth exploring adding
Functions support in the upstream base scripts themselves via environment
variable.
*/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

love the top-of-file overview comment ❤️

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2025
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Apr 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, lkingland

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 9f6a135 into knative:main Apr 2, 2025
38 checks passed
@@ -45,20 +63,23 @@ func buildGoLayer(cfg *buildConfig, p v1.Platform) (desc v1.Descriptor, layer v1
desc.Platform = &p

// Blob
blob := path(cfg.blobsDir(), desc.Digest.Hex)
blob := filepath.Join(cfg.blobsDir(), desc.Digest.Hex)
if cfg.verbose {
fmt.Printf("mv %v %v\n", rel(cfg.buildDir(), target), rel(cfg.buildDir(), blob))
}
err = os.Rename(target, blob)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lkingland you are ignoring the err here.

matejvasek added a commit to openshift-knative/kn-plugin-func that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit to openshift-knative/kn-plugin-func that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
* Pick knative#2685

Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <[email protected]>

* Fix Python S2I On-Cluster build

Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <[email protected]>
@lkingland lkingland deleted the scaffolding-python branch May 13, 2025 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/enhancement lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants