[12.x] with() helper call simplification
#57041
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
when we have a well defined closure, there is no reason to use the `with()` helper, or even the closure at all. in most cases, but using a temporary variable we achieve the same effect with arguably cleaner easier to read code.
I can't figure out how to fix the tests right now, so reverting these
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is a resubmission with all tests passing.
this removes unnecessary calls of the
with()helper function. when we have a known closure, we can get the same result with much simpler code.this reduces the call stack, and simplifies the opcodes necessary for this code.