--branch option not reported in cobertura

[nedbat]

Originally reported by djcoin (Bitbucket: djcoin, GitHub: djcoin)

---

It seems the --branch option does not behave properly with cobertura. It keeps saying 0 % for conditionnals. A quick look in the coverage.xml seems to have thos figures in. So maybe the Cobertura format has been updated, and is not correct now.

This has been stated using Hudson and the cobertura plugin.

---

• Bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/65
• This issue had attachments: coverage.xml, coverage_branch.png, cobertura_updir.png. See the original issue for details.

[nedbat]

Can you provide me with version information for Hudson and the cobertura plugin?

[nedbat]

Original comment by djcoin (Bitbucket: djcoin, GitHub: djcoin)

---

Sorry, i fill this issue much too quickly, here are some details:

Hudson ver. 1.352
Hudson Cobertura plugin: 0.8.11

A relevant screenshot showing the issue and the coverage.xml file (that seems right!) generated are attached.

Here you can see one conditional is properly tested and the other is not, we should then get 50 % coverage on conditionals, yet, it sticks to 0 percent, whatever test you may submit.

Weirder, if you go one dir up, you can see that conditional are not detected (N/A), whereas they are set to 0 when browsing the right file.

Thanks,

Simon Thépot

[nedbat]

Original comment by zorgzorg2 (Bitbucket: zorgzorg2, GitHub: Unknown)

---

Hi,

I can confirm the bug, with hudson 1.359 and cobertura plugin 0.8.11.

Martin

[nedbat]

Original comment by Devin Bayer (Bitbucket: akvadrako, GitHub: akvadrako)

---

It looks like the issue is CoberturaCoverageParser.java requires some more attributes:

196	            if (Boolean.parseBoolean(attributes.getValue("branch"))) {
197	                final String conditionCoverage = attributes.getValue("condition-coverage");
198	                if (conditionCoverage != null) {
199	                    // some cases in the wild have branch = true but no condition-coverage attribute
201	                    // should be of the format xxx% (yyy/zzz)
202	                    Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile("(\\d*)\\%\\s*\\((\\d*)/(\\d*)\\)").matcher(conditionCoverage);

otherwise is just ignores the branch tag.

[nedbat]

Original comment by Anonymous

---

Thanks for taking into account account my comments.
Do you guys know if this issue is available for newer version of Hudson ?

[nedbat]

Also see issue #81 with some more details.

[nedbat]

Issue #81 was marked as a duplicate of this issue.

[nedbat]

Fixed in <<changeset b1911a191a3b (bb)>>.