Skip to content

Conversation

dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz commented Jun 21, 2025

improve the tab completion capabilities around computed properties by replacing the use of brittle and error prone Regex checks with more robust AST based analysis


Followup from #58709

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. labels Jun 21, 2025
Comment on lines -1483 to -1492
// Handle variable member lookup.
// We support simple chained expressions like the following (no function
// calls, etc.). That is for simplicity and also because we *eval* that
// leading expression so for safety (see WARNING above) don't want to
// eval function calls.
//
// foo.bar<|> # completions for 'foo' with filter 'bar'
// spam.eggs.<|> # completions for 'spam.eggs' with filter ''
// foo<|> # all scope vars with filter 'foo'
// foo.<|> # completions for 'foo' with filter ''
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: I'm removing this comment since I think that it is inaccurate (and as a consequence misleading), since various type of lines pass through here, like for example { a: true }

I think/hope that the code structure makes it clear enough what this else if block is for (I also have half a mind to do some refactoring to also make things clearer later on 🤔)

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz force-pushed the dario/improve-tab-completion-on-computed-props branch from b502583 to fdfdac0 Compare June 21, 2025 12:20
improve the tab completion capabilities around computed properties
by replacing the use of brittle and error prone Regex checks with
more robust AST based analysis
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz force-pushed the dario/improve-tab-completion-on-computed-props branch from fdfdac0 to 1398800 Compare June 21, 2025 12:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.10891% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.09%. Comparing base (c3b9868) to head (1398800).
Report is 168 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/repl.js 89.10% 10 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #58775      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.13%   90.09%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         640      640              
  Lines      188294   188399     +105     
  Branches    36923    36945      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits       169712   169747      +35     
- Misses      11304    11354      +50     
- Partials     7278     7298      +20     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/repl.js 94.78% <89.10%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

... and 24 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jun 21, 2025
@anonrig anonrig added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 26, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 26, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 8ba66c5 into nodejs:main Jun 26, 2025
60 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 8ba66c5

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz deleted the dario/improve-tab-completion-on-computed-props branch June 26, 2025 10:38
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025
improve the tab completion capabilities around computed properties
by replacing the use of brittle and error prone Regex checks with
more robust AST based analysis

PR-URL: #58775
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 added the backport-requested-v22.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v22.x-staging branch. label Jul 21, 2025
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Jul 21, 2025

This doesn't land cleanly on v22.x-staging, we'd need a backport PR if we want it on v22.x

addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have introduced
the ability for completion to cause side effects, specifically, calling
arbitrary functions or variable assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing when
attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have messages
or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side effects,
which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the expectations
that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically verify
that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances. I am assuming
here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding tests have been
removed/replaced in this commit.

Refs: nodejs#58709
Refs: nodejs#58775
Refs: nodejs#57909
Refs: nodejs#58891
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have introduced
the ability for completion to cause side effects, specifically, calling
arbitrary functions or variable assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing when
attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have messages
or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side effects,
which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the expectations
that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically verify
that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances. I am assuming
here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding tests have been
removed/replaced in this commit.

Refs: nodejs#58709
Refs: nodejs#58775
Refs: nodejs#57909
Refs: nodejs#58891
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have
introduced the ability for completion to cause side effects,
specifically, calling arbitrary functions or variable
assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing
when attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have
messages or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side
effects, which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the
expectations that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically
verify that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances.
I am assuming here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding
tests have been removed/replaced in this commit.

Refs: nodejs#58709
Refs: nodejs#58775
Refs: nodejs#57909
Refs: nodejs#58891
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have
introduced the ability for completion to cause side effects,
specifically, calling arbitrary functions or variable
assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing
when attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have
messages or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side
effects, which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the
expectations that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically
verify that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances.
I am assuming here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding
tests have been removed/replaced in this commit.

Fixes: nodejs#58903
Refs: nodejs#58709
Refs: nodejs#58775
Refs: nodejs#57909
Refs: nodejs#58891
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have
introduced the ability for completion to cause side effects,
specifically, calling arbitrary functions or variable
assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing
when attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have
messages or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side
effects, which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the
expectations that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically
verify that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances.
I am assuming here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding
tests have been removed/replaced in this commit.

Fixes: nodejs#59731
Fixes: nodejs#58903
Refs: nodejs#58709
Refs: nodejs#58775
Refs: nodejs#57909
Refs: nodejs#58891
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have
introduced the ability for completion to cause side effects,
specifically, calling arbitrary functions or variable
assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing
when attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have
messages or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side
effects, which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the
expectations that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically
verify that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances.
I am assuming here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding
tests have been removed/replaced in this commit.

Fixes: #59731
Fixes: #58903
Refs: #58709
Refs: #58775
Refs: #57909
Refs: #58891
PR-URL: #59774
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Dario Piotrowicz <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
A number of recent changes to the REPL tab completion logic have
introduced the ability for completion to cause side effects,
specifically, calling arbitrary functions or variable
assignments/updates.

This was first introduced in 0722023 and the problem exacerbated in
8ba66c5. Our team noticed this because our tests started failing
when attempting to update to Node.js 20.19.5.

Some recent commits, such as 1093f38 or 6945337, have
messages or PR descriptions that imply the intention to avoid side
effects, which I can can generally be agreed upon is in line with the
expectations that a user has of autocomplete functionality.
However, some of the tests introduced in those commts specifically
verify that side effects *can* happen under specific circunmstances.
I am assuming here that this is unintentional, and the corresponding
tests have been removed/replaced in this commit.

Fixes: #59731
Fixes: #58903
Refs: #58709
Refs: #58775
Refs: #57909
Refs: #58891
PR-URL: #59774
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Dario Piotrowicz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. backport-requested-v22.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v22.x-staging branch. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants