Skip to content

Conversation

oceanc80
Copy link
Contributor

@oceanc80 oceanc80 commented Sep 5, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. labels Sep 5, 2025
@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 5, 2025

@oceanc80: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2025
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by @jianzhangbjz

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by @jianzhangbjz.

In response to this:

/verified by @jianzhangbjz

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 9, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 9, 2025

/label merge/squash

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@tmshort: The label(s) /label merge/squash cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label merge/squash

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 9, 2025

To not break the bumper
/label tide/merge-method-rebase

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the tide/merge-method-rebase Denotes a PR that should be rebased by tide when it merges. label Sep 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@jianzhangbjz: The label(s) /label jira/valid-reference cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label jira/valid-reference

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Contributor

Try to add jira/valid-reference label.
/retitle NO-ISSUE: Add pedjak and trgeiger as reviewers

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add pedjak and trgeiger as reviewers NO-ISSUE: Add pedjak and trgeiger as reviewers Sep 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@oceanc80: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 11, 2025

/verify-owners

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

/hold
Until we fix the bumper issue

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 12, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

/remove-label tide/merge-method-rebase

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the tide/merge-method-rebase Denotes a PR that should be rebased by tide when it merges. label Sep 12, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 15, 2025

/unhold
#471 merged

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 15, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 15, 2025

/verify-owners

1 similar comment
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 16, 2025

/verify-owners

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 19, 2025

@gavinmbell: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 19, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gavinmbell, oceanc80, perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/verify-owners

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2025

The following users are mentioned in DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS file(s) but are untrusted for the following reasons. One way to make the user trusted is to add them as members of the openshift org. You can then trigger verification by writing /verify-owners in a comment.

  • trgeiger
    • User is not a member of the org. User is not a collaborator. Satisfy at least one of these conditions to make the user trusted.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

I've reached out to Gavin to see about adding Tayler to the openshift org - still waiting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/invalid-owners-file Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid OWNERS file in it. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants