Revert #1053 and #1068, keeping FAQ.Heading bugfix

[joshfarrant]

Summary

Reverts #1053 and #1068

Keeps a fix which resolves a bug where FAQ.Heading wouldn't respect the provided as prop when used within an FAQGroup.

List of notable changes:

I recommend viewing the changes by commit for a clear breakdown of the removals and additions.

What should reviewers focus on?

• Happy with the phrasing in the docs?

Steps to test:

Supporting resources (related issues, external links, etc):

Contributor checklist:

• All new and existing CI checks pass
• Tests prove that the feature works and covers both happy and unhappy paths
• Any drop in coverage, breaking changes or regressions have been documented above
• UI Changes contain new visual snapshots (generated by adding update snapshots label to the PR)
• All developer debugging and non-functional logging has been removed
• Related issues have been referenced in the PR description

Reviewer checklist:

• Check that pull request and proposed changes adhere to our contribution guidelines and code of conduct
• Check that tests prove the feature works and covers both happy and unhappy paths
• Check that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 1242494

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 8 packages

Name	Type
@primer/react-brand	Patch
@primer/brand-docs	Patch
@primer/brand-css	Patch
@primer/brand-primitives	Patch
@primer/brand-e2e	Patch
@primer/brand-fonts	Patch
@primer/brand-config	Patch
@primer/brand-storybook	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

🟢 No design token changes found

[github-actions]

🟢 No visual differences found

Our visual comparison tests did not find any differences in the UI.

[rezrah]

👍

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.