Skip to content

Conversation

gaborbernat
Copy link
Member

@gaborbernat gaborbernat commented Dec 2, 2022

Resolves #2568

Signed-off-by: Bernát Gábor <[email protected]>
@gaborbernat gaborbernat merged commit 188ba4a into tox-dev:main Dec 3, 2022
@gaborbernat gaborbernat deleted the recursive-extra branch December 3, 2022 01:29
@hynek
Copy link

hynek commented Dec 3, 2022

Dumb question: could this be adapted for pip-tools which also lack the support? It's like the final piece for standards-based workflows: jazzband/pip-tools#1685

@gaborbernat
Copy link
Member Author

That's a question for the pip-tools maintainers 👍

@ssbarnea
Copy link
Member

ssbarnea commented Dec 3, 2022

@hynek I keep an eye on pip-tools, I could help reviewing a PR. Still this in particular might be too tricky to implement and I would prefer to see lots of stuff removed from pip-tools before this would be added.

So far, I prefered to avoid recursivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recursive extra support
3 participants