Skip to content

uptime: use "0 users" instead of "0 user" #8765

uptime: use "0 users" instead of "0 user"

uptime: use "0 users" instead of "0 user" #8765

Triggered via pull request June 5, 2025 13:37
Status Success
Total duration 3m 0s
Artifacts

code-quality.yml

on: pull_request
Style/toml
15s
Style/toml
Style/Python
7s
Style/Python
Matrix: Style/format
Matrix: Style/lint
Matrix: Style/spelling
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error, 3 warnings, and 13 notices
Style/Python
GNU test failed: tests/ls/test2. tests/ls/test2 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Style/Python
Note: The gnu test tests/cp/test2 is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Style/Python
Note: The gnu test tests/cp/test2 is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Style/Python
Note: The gnu test tests/cp/test2 is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Style/Python
Congrats! The gnu test tests/ls/test3 is no longer failing!
Style/Python
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cp/test1 (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Style/Python
Skip an intermittent issue tests/ls/test2 (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Style/Python
Congrats! The gnu test tests/cp/test4 is now passing!
Style/Python
Congrats! The gnu test tests/ls/test3 is no longer failing!
Style/Python
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cp/test1 (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Style/Python
Congrats! The gnu test tests/cp/test4 is now passing!
Style/Python
Congrats! The gnu test tests/ls/test3 is no longer failing!
Style/Python
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cp/test1 (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Style/Python
Skip an intermittent issue tests/ls/test2 (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
sccache stats
100% - 3 hits, 0 misses, 0 errors
sccache stats
100% - 5 hits, 0 misses, 0 errors
sccache stats
0% - 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 errors