Skip to content

Conversation

Isotr0py
Copy link
Member

@Isotr0py Isotr0py commented Mar 20, 2025

FIX #15122
FIX #15197

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <[email protected]>
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 20, 2025 17:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Mar 20, 2025
@vllm-bot vllm-bot merged commit 1e50834 into vllm-project:main Mar 21, 2025
40 of 43 checks passed
@Isotr0py Isotr0py deleted the fix-qwen2_5-vl-windows branch March 21, 2025 03:15
erictang000 pushed a commit to erictang000/vllm that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2025
@Stonesjtu
Copy link

Stonesjtu commented Mar 27, 2025

@Isotr0py we found v0.8.1 introduces some words (~10%) missing when using Qwen2.5-VL for OCR tasks, probably the results between the correct and wrong version is not so obvious.

And v0.7.3 works perfect. Hope this information could help

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

This PR is in v0.8.2, so if you update to the latest version the problem should be solved

lulmer pushed a commit to lulmer/vllm that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
@Lizuole007
Copy link

@Isotr0py we found v0.8.1 introduces some words (~10%) missing when using Qwen2.5-VL for OCR tasks, probably the results between the correct and wrong version is not so obvious.

And v0.7.3 works perfect. Hope this information could help

Have you solved this problem?

@Stonesjtu
Copy link

@Isotr0py we found v0.8.1 introduces some words (~10%) missing when using Qwen2.5-VL for OCR tasks, probably the results between the correct and wrong version is not so obvious.
And v0.7.3 works perfect. Hope this information could help

Have you solved this problem?

you can either upgrade to v0.8.2 or downgrade to 0.7.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Qwen2.5-VL Cannot Output Correct Content under 0.8.1 [Bug]: Qwen VL 2.5 doesn't work in v0.8.0 - again
5 participants