Skip to content

Conversation

varun-sundar-rabindranath
Copy link
Contributor

@varun-sundar-rabindranath varun-sundar-rabindranath commented Jun 11, 2025

Purpose

There is value in being able to try different MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE quickly, without code change,

  1. Performance Tuning
  2. For large MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE and large DP size, we run into OOMs

Long-Term : Based on profile runs, set it to a constant-value / calculate at run-time based on profile runs.

Test Plan

Local Testing on H100.

Test Result

Verified that the value set via the env var is being printed correctly in the logs.

Varun Sundar Rabindranath added 3 commits June 11, 2025 07:29
Signed-off-by: Varun Sundar Rabindranath <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Varun Sundar Rabindranath <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Varun Sundar Rabindranath <[email protected]>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @varun-sundar-rabindranath, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces an environment variable (VLLM_MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE) to control the chunk size used in MoE layers when running with Data Parallelism. This change provides flexibility for users to tune performance and manage memory usage (specifically to avoid OOMs) without requiring code modifications, supporting easier experimentation and optimization.

Highlights

  • Configurability: The MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE parameter, which affects the chunking of tokens processed by MoE layers in Data Parallel mode, is now configurable via the VLLM_MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE environment variable.
  • Code Cleanup: Removed the hardcoded MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE constant from vllm/model_executor/layers/fused_moe/layer.py.
  • Usage Update: Updated the MoE layer implementation to read the chunk size from the new environment variable definition in vllm.envs.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@varun-sundar-rabindranath
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bnellnm @tlrmchlsmth @abmfy @simon-mo PTAL! Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request makes MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE configurable via an environment variable, which is beneficial for performance tuning and OOM prevention in MoE models. The changes are well-implemented by updating vllm.envs and replacing the hardcoded constant in the MoE layer. Logging for the new configurable value has also been added.

My primary feedback is to suggest adding input validation for VLLM_MOE_DP_CHUNK_SIZE to ensure it's a positive integer, enhancing robustness against misconfiguration.

@mgoin mgoin added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 12, 2025
@mgoin mgoin enabled auto-merge (squash) June 12, 2025 13:52
@mgoin mgoin merged commit 9d880f5 into vllm-project:main Jun 12, 2025
79 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants