Skip to content

Conversation

andyxning
Copy link
Contributor

@andyxning andyxning commented Aug 16, 2025

Purpose

Compare struct fields in IntermediateTensors equal method. I.e., compare tensors.

Test Plan

NA

Test Result

NA

(Optional) Documentation Update

NA

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix a bug in the __eq__ method of the IntermediateTensors class. The original implementation was incorrect. The proposed change is an improvement but is still not fully correct for comparing dictionaries of PyTorch tensors. My review provides a corrected implementation for comparing the tensors attribute and points out that another attribute, kv_connector_output, is also missing from the comparison.

vllm/sequence.py Outdated
Comment on lines 1165 to 1166
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The dictionary comparison self.tensors == other.tensors is incorrect for dictionaries of PyTorch tensors. tensor1 == tensor2 performs an element-wise comparison and returns a boolean tensor, not a scalar boolean. This will cause the dictionary comparison to almost always return False if tensors have more than one element. You should iterate through the dictionary and use torch.equal() to compare tensors.

Additionally, for a complete equality check, the kv_connector_output attribute should also be compared. I've left that out of the suggestion for brevity, but it should be added for correctness.

    def __eq__(self, other: object):
        if not isinstance(other, self.__class__):
            return False
        if self.tensors.keys() != other.tensors.keys():
            return False
        return all(
            torch.equal(self.tensors[k], other.tensors[k])
            for k in self.tensors)

@andyxning andyxning force-pushed the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch from 610fe9c to 1b1c62a Compare August 16, 2025 15:16
vllm/sequence.py Outdated
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a unit test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@andyxning andyxning force-pushed the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch 2 times, most recently from 41bbfc6 to c591a0b Compare August 17, 2025 16:57
@andyxning andyxning force-pushed the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch 4 times, most recently from 7c494e3 to 3cdcc7f Compare August 18, 2025 03:33
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 enabled auto-merge (squash) August 18, 2025 05:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Aug 18, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled August 18, 2025 06:09

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@andyxning andyxning force-pushed the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch from 3cdcc7f to 6dc1dab Compare August 18, 2025 06:09
@andyxning andyxning force-pushed the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch from 6dc1dab to 9d2e155 Compare August 18, 2025 06:31
@vllm-bot vllm-bot merged commit 5a30bd1 into vllm-project:main Aug 18, 2025
35 of 38 checks passed
@andyxning andyxning deleted the fix_IntermediateTensors_equal_method branch August 18, 2025 11:34
princepride pushed a commit to princepride/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
divakar-amd pushed a commit to divakar-amd/vllm_upstream that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
cyang49 pushed a commit to cyang49/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
djmmoss pushed a commit to djmmoss/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
epwalsh pushed a commit to epwalsh/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
xiao-llm pushed a commit to xiao-llm/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
zhewenl pushed a commit to zhewenl/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
mengxingkongzhouhan pushed a commit to mengxingkongzhouhan/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2025
zhewenl pushed a commit to zhewenl/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants