-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
🚀 feat: implement comprehensive CI/CD pipeline with Docker Hub and GitHub packages #66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🚀 feat: implement comprehensive CI/CD pipeline with Docker Hub and GitHub packages #66
Conversation
…eration Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline for the unthread-discord-bot, establishing automated Docker builds, multi-registry publishing, and supply chain security features. The implementation follows enterprise-grade practices with development and production workflows.
Key changes include:
- CI/CD Workflows: Development pipeline for
dev
branch and PR builds, plus production pipeline for automated releases with semantic versioning - Docker Infrastructure: Multi-stage Dockerfile with Node.js 22 LTS Alpine, security-hardened configuration, and multi-architecture support
- Security Features: SBOM generation, vulnerability scanning, build attestations, and local development tooling for security analysis
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
.github/workflows/build.yml |
Development CI pipeline with multi-arch builds, SBOM generation, and vulnerability scanning |
.github/workflows/release.yml |
Production release pipeline with semantic versioning and dual registry publishing |
Dockerfile |
Multi-stage build with security hardening, non-root execution, and optimized layers |
package.json |
Added Docker and security-focused npm scripts for development workflow |
scripts/generate-sbom.sh |
Local SBOM generation tool with syft integration and developer-friendly features |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
.github/workflows/release.yml
Outdated
GHCR_TAGS="$GHCR_TAGS,${{ env.REGISTRY_GHCR }}:v$PATCH" | ||
GHCR_TAGS="$GHCR_TAGS,${{ env.REGISTRY_GHCR }}:v$MINOR" | ||
GHCR_TAGS="$GHCR_TAGS,${{ env.REGISTRY_GHCR }}:v$MAJOR" | ||
# Combine all tags |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment appears to be misaligned. The comment suggests combining tags, but the actual tag combination happens on line 76. Consider moving the comment to line 76 or removing it if it's redundant.
# Combine all tags |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
set -euo pipefail | ||
|
||
# Check for required dependencies | ||
REQUIRED_COMMANDS=("docker" "jq" "curl") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The script checks for 'curl' dependency but never uses it in the actual implementation. Either remove 'curl' from the required commands array or implement its intended usage.
REQUIRED_COMMANDS=("docker" "jq" "curl") | |
REQUIRED_COMMANDS=("docker" "jq") |
Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@copilot can you apply the suggested changes from the code review? |
…matting Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
Applied the suggested changes from the code review in commit 793b4bc: Fixed Issues:
The CI/CD pipeline now follows proper formatting standards and uses the correct user context for non-root container execution. |
@copilot did we update the README with this update? |
…cumentation Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
Yes! I've now updated the README with comprehensive documentation about the new CI/CD pipeline and Docker deployment options in commit d6beb4f. The README now includes: New sections added:
The documentation covers all the CI/CD features we implemented including multi-architecture Docker images, security scanning, SBOM generation, and the automated GitHub Actions workflows. |
@copilot now, lets stick to yarn workflow, we should not use NPM here. Remove any npm package lock file. |
…ation Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
Fixed the yarn workflow consistency in commit c65d2ed. The repository already used yarn throughout (yarn.lock, .yarnrc.yml, package.json scripts), but I found and corrected one npm reference in the deploy_commands.ts documentation comment. All package manager commands now consistently use yarn, and there are no npm lock files in the repository. |
@copilot can you get the latest code from the dev branch? I merged new code. |
I've successfully merged the latest code from the dev branch in commit 66ca285. The integration includes:
All features work together seamlessly and the build/lint processes pass successfully with Yarn v4. |
The CI/CD pipeline is now production-ready with complete yarn workflow consistency and includes the latest attachment features from the dev branch. All documentation references use yarn commands, no npm lock files exist, and the entire project follows yarn v4 best practices for package management.
Latest Integration
Successfully merged the latest code from the dev branch, which includes:
The CI/CD pipeline maintains full compatibility with all new features while ensuring consistent yarn workflow throughout the entire project.
Created from VS Code via the GitHub Pull Request extension.
Created from VS Code via the GitHub Pull Request extension.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.