Skip to content

Conversation

usmansaleem
Copy link
Collaborator

-- Update version to 1.3.0

 -- Update version to 1.3.0
@usmansaleem usmansaleem requested a review from james-prysm August 7, 2025 00:46
@nflaig
Copy link
Member

nflaig commented Aug 7, 2025

-- Update version to 1.3.0

1.2.0 doesn't seem to exist, or is there a reason for skipping it?

@@ -177,6 +179,19 @@ components:
required:
- version
- data
AggregateAndProofRequestFulu:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what changed here for Fulu?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is needed for version I think but we can just reference AggregateAndProofElectra on line 193

@@ -731,6 +770,19 @@ components:
required:
- version
- block_header
BlockRequestFulu:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fulu block is just electra block 🤔

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

version field needs update though

@@ -461,6 +476,17 @@ components:
type: "string"
committee_bits:
type: "string"
AttestationFulu:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't think there's a attestation fulu

@@ -177,6 +179,19 @@ components:
required:
- version
- data
AggregateAndProofRequestFulu:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is needed for version I think but we can just reference AggregateAndProofElectra on line 193

@@ -556,6 +582,17 @@ components:
selection_proof:
type: string
description: Bytes96 hexadecimal
AggregateAndProofFulu:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can be removed as it's same as AggregateAndProofElectra

@@ -731,6 +770,19 @@ components:
required:
- version
- block_header
BlockRequestFulu:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

version field needs update though

jframe
jframe previously requested changes Aug 11, 2025
@usmansaleem
Copy link
Collaborator Author

-- Update version to 1.3.0

1.2.0 doesn't seem to exist, or is there a reason for skipping it?

I think we missed cutting a release at #17. It should've been tagged as 1.2.0

@jframe jframe dismissed their stale review August 14, 2025 22:15

changes on pr

@@ -164,13 +165,14 @@ components:
required:
- version
- data
AggregateAndProofRequestElectra:
AggregateAndProofRequestElectraOrFulu:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doesn't this break the mapping? ie. now FULU version can be valid for ELECTRA

would probably just copy-paste and create a AggregateAndProofRequestFulu with only FULU as version but it can reference AggregateAndProofElectra since it's unchanged

same for BlockRequestFulu as there are no changes there

@usmansaleem usmansaleem requested a review from nflaig September 6, 2025 06:45
@usmansaleem
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nflaig @james-prysm I've pushed v1.2.0 tag as well (which we missed when we made ELECTRA changes). I've updated the index.html with it as well.

Copy link
Member

@nflaig nflaig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@usmansaleem usmansaleem merged commit a28c2fc into ethereum:main Sep 8, 2025
2 checks passed
@usmansaleem usmansaleem deleted the fusaka branch September 8, 2025 23:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants